Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2001 12:11:32 +0100
From: Jasper McCrea <jasper@guideguide.com>
Subject: Re: references, slices, voodoo
Message-Id: <3B9759E4.D27DAB92@guideguide.com>

Bart Lateur wrote:
> 
> Jasper McCrea wrote:
> 
> >Benchmark: running mine, yate, each for at least 3 CPU seconds...
> >      mine:  5 wallclock secs ( 3.85 usr +  0.01 sys =  3.86 CPU) @
> >18.91/s (n=73)
> >      yate:  6 wallclock secs ( 3.64 usr +  0.03 sys =  3.67 CPU) @
> >19.89/s (n=73)
> >
> >was with 4000.
> >
> >Benchmark: running mine, yate, each for at least 3 CPU seconds...
> >      mine:  6 wallclock secs ( 3.77 usr +  0.00 sys =  3.77 CPU) @
> >6.63/s (n=25)
> >      yate:  5 wallclock secs ( 3.67 usr +  0.00 sys =  3.67 CPU) @
> >9.81/s (n=36)
> >
> >with 8000
> >
> >so obviously there's a crossover in speed.
> 
> Eh ,no. Yours is a bit slower all the time.
> 
> --
>         Bart.

Bart

You missed the first post in which I modestly introduced this sub with a
becnhmark on a ten element array, and it was quite a bit quicker (around
25%).

(I'm not really so stupid as to read only the above, and come to that
conclusion)

(ok, I am, but in this case I didn't)

Jasp
-- 
      split//,'019617511192'.
      '17011111610114101114'.
      '21011141011840799901'.
            '17101174';
            foreach(0..         # my
            $#_){$_[$_          # signature is too
            ++]^=$_[$_          # bignature
            --]^=$_[$_
]^=$_[++    $_]if!($_%
2)}$g.=$_  ,chr($g)=~
 /(\w)/&&($o.=$1and
   $g='')foreach@_;
      print"$o\n"